The social media presence reports for the third quarter (Q3) of 2011 are out and can be downloaded on your personal landing page. We will take a closer look at indicators like Facebook and Twitter and whether or not institutions feature social media icons on their homepage and show you the progress made since the last report. For more information about the second quarter (Q2) report, please read our previous blog posts.
The overall picture of all social media tools across all participating institutions doesn’t show big surprises for Q3. The ranking at the end of this quarter is almost identical to the ranking at the end of the second quarter of 2011. Most institutions have an increased presence on Facebook, mostly due to more community pages as reported in the last quarter.
While there are no big shifts in terms of official Facebook and Twitter presence, there is some movement when it comes to including social media icons on the homepage. The percentage of institutions that feature at least one social media icon on their homepage has gone up from 26% to 34%.
Facebook
According to our research, participating institutions have not created any new official Facebook pages. This is the breakdown for each of the four groups participating in the program:
- Federal institutes of technology: EPFL is the only one of the two institutes with an official Facebook presence and leads in terms of Facebook likes amongst all institutions.
- Universities: Eight of the 10 Swiss universities are present on Facebook, while HSG and UNIL have no presence.
- Universities of applied sciences: Out of the 14 participating universities of applied sciences, 10 have an official presence on Facebook*.
- Research institutes and other public institutions: Three out of the 11 participating institutions have an official Facebook presence and ZBUZH comes in fifth overall in terms of likes for Q3.
For a list of all official Facebook pages found, visit this page with a list of links.
Twitter
Sixty percent of participating institutions have an official Facebook account and 50% have an official Twitter account:
- Federal institutes of technology: The most followed Twitter accounts are EPFL and ETH Zurich. EPFL has accounts in English and French and a combined number of 2396 followers. ETHZ also has two accounts, one in English and one in German, and has a total of 1220 followers.
- Universities: Eight out of 10 universities have an official Twitter account. The only two universities without a Twitter account are HSG and UZH.
- Universities of applied sciences: Eight of the 14 participating universities of applied sciences have an official Twitter account.
- Research institutes and other public institutions: The research institutes and other public institutions are not using Twitter for outreach. ZBUZH is the only member of this group that tweets with an official account.
Take a look at this list of official Twitter accounts.
Social Media Icons on Homepage
As mentioned in the last blog post, we take the social media icons on the homepage of the institutions as an indicator for the integration of social media in the institution’s communications efforts. At the end of the second quarter of 2011, nine institutions featured at least one social media icon on their homepage with a link to the official account (26% of the participating institutions). At this point 13 of the participating institutions have social media icons on their homepage, which equals 34%.
The table below provides an overview of Facebook and Twitter presence of all participating institutions in comparison with use of social media icons on their homepage. Institutions in bold have both an official Twitter and Facebook account and feature at least one social media icon on their homepage:
| Institution | Has official Twitter account | Has official Facebook page | Featured social media icon on homepage in Q2** | Featured social media icon on homepage in Q3** |
| BFH | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| CRUS | ||||
| DODIS | Yes | n/a *** | Yes | |
| EAWAG | ||||
| EHL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ELS | Yes | |||
| EMPA | ||||
| EPFL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ETHRAT | ||||
| ETHZ | Yes | |||
| EURESEARCH | ||||
| FFHS | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| FHNW | ||||
| FHS | ||||
| HEIGVD | Yes | |||
| HESSO | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HSG | ||||
| HSLU | Yes | Yes | ||
| HWZ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PHZH | Yes | Yes | ||
| PSI | ||||
| SSS | n/a *** | |||
| SUPSI | ||||
| Switch | ||||
| UNIBAS | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| UNIBE | Yes | Yes | ||
| UNIFR | Yes | Yes | ||
| UNIGE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| UNIL | Yes | |||
| UNILI | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| UNILU | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| UNINE | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| USI | Yes | Yes | ||
| UZH | Yes | |||
| WSL | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| ZBUZH | yes | Yes | n/a ** | Yes |
| ZHAW | Yes | |||
| ZHDK | yes | Yes |
A majority of the participants have an official presence on Twitter or Facebook:
- Sixty-eight percent of the participating institutions have either an official Facebook page or a Twitter account, but only 50% of these institutions actually feature a social media icon on their homepage with a link to their official presence on social media.
- Only five institutions have a Facebook and Twitter presence and feature at least one social media icon on their homepage.
- The majority of these five institutions are from the French part of Switzerland.
- HWZ is the only German institution to be active on Facebook and Twitter and feature the icons on their homepage. Data for ZBUZH is not available for Q2, which makes it impossible to identify them as a frontrunner.
Please note that we have only taken into account official Facebook pages and official Twitter accounts managed by the umbrella organization. A large number of participants have very active departments, but no social media presence as an organization as a whole.
Please let us know if any of your social media accounts are missing.
For a list of participating institutions go to this page.
____________________
* Our research for universities of applied sciences is limited to the universities participating in the program. Depending on the structure and nature of the institutions, they either participate as a whole (like BFH or HSLU) or as subschools (e.g. most of the subschools of the university of applied sciences in Zurich participate, such as the HWZ or ZHAW).
**icon has to link to their official presence
*** joined the program after Q2 and data for that quarter is therefore not available






November 21, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Julia, thanks so much for this post.
Reading through it I had to ask myself I just wonder what it means. For instance,
1 – does presence mean these institutions have embraced user-generated content – see Henderson, Dawn. (2010) Web2.0 and business schools – an analysis of the top 20 UK and US business schools. (Undergraduate thesis, Strathclyde University, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/dawnahenderson/web20-and-business-schools-dawn-henderson-4791288
2 – Is social media presence the right benchmark to use for assessing the quality of education or anything for that matter – see Univ. of Chicago (bottom of post – http://commetrics.com/?p=17082/)?
Thanks so much for sharing.
November 23, 2011 at 9:31 am
Thanks for your comment and your questions in regards to our social media presence reports. The purpose of these quarterly reports is to give our program participants an overview of their social media presence across selected social media tools. Please take a look at this blog post to get more information about these reports: http://socialmediaswitzerland.org/2011/09/02/understanding-your-social-media-presence-part-1/
The reports do not take into account if these institutions have embraced user-generated content or reflect on the quality of education. The presence of an institution in social media as it appears in our reports does not necessarily reflect on the institution’s quality of education or whether or not they embrace user-generated content.
Please keep in mind that we provide participating institutions with monthly reports about online conversations relevant to their institutions. This helps them learn not only what is being said about them but who, when, and where it was said.
If you have any more questions, please let me know.
Julia
November 23, 2011 at 11:06 am
Dear Julia
Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply above. Incidentally, thanks for the link and yes I looked at this informative post.
Of course I agree with your statement that you do neither measure quality of education nor what social media presence means for teaching. Nevertheless, I was trying to point out that unless you have objectives and measures that identify how social media activities affect your key drivers (e.g., increasing the quality of applications, number of job offers for graduates, etc.).
Reading these two blog posts does not tell me why you measure conversation, how you measure it exactly and how this affects the key drivers for these institutions.
So my question is:
a – how do you measure conversation exactly, and
b – how do you distinguish conversation from engagement.
For instance, we have published how we measure engagement on Facebook (partial list of what our method does) in this blog post:
==> http://commetrics.com/articles/2011-engagement-metrics-4-social-media-marketing/
I look forward to your reply. Merci.
November 23, 2011 at 5:14 pm
Dear Urs, the social media presence reports do not measure conversation or engagement, they only measure presence. We use Radian6 (www.radian6.com) to measure conversation and engagement and provide every program participant with a monthly report. It is up to each one of our program participants to define objectives and goals. Our reports aim to provide them with information to help shape them (if they are building their plans) or track them. I will definitely take a look at your blog post to get new ideas! Julia
November 24, 2011 at 2:42 am
Dear Julia
Thank you a bit confused you say “… do not measure conversation or engagement,…” and then a bit later you say.
“We use Radian 6 to measure conversation and engagement…”
Can you please clarify?
November 28, 2011 at 2:55 pm
Sorry for the confusion. We provide participants with a quarterly report about their presence, and a monthly Radian6 report. More about Radian6 can be found here: http://www.radian6.com/
Pingback: In God we trust, all others bring data « Swiss Academia and the Social Media Landscape